We are career demographers, epidemiologists, geriatricians, and other scientists with expertise in the study of aging, who have identified and extensively studied the world’s longevity “hot spots,” often referred to as “blue zones.” We are writing to object to Saul Newman’s academically misleading and deeply flawed preprint paper, which has not yet been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, despite having been submitted for publication over four years ago. Furthermore, Saul Newman is a plant biologist with no academic training or expertise in demography, gerontology, or geriatrics, and has no record of publication in these fields of study.
Below, we have provided links to some of our peer-reviewed academic papers, which thoroughly detail how we have confirmed the ages of centenarians and older individuals in each of the blue zones we have studied, along with the statistical methodology used to validate their extraordinary longevity.
Blue zones are geographically defined areas with a disproportionately high number of exceptionally aged people, especially nonagenarians and centenarians. These zones first gained international attention two decades ago when the term was introduced in the well-respected, peer-reviewed journal Experimental Gerontology by Dr. Michel Poulain and colleagues. The term later appeared in National Geographic (2). Since then, numerous scientific papers have validated the demographic origins of blue zones and attempted to extract valuable insights from them (3-12). They have been fully validated by strict demographic criteria in four locations thus far: Okinawa, Japan; Sardinia, Italy; Ikaria, Greece; and Nicoya, Costa Rica.
Newman, in his unreviewed preprints (13, 14), omits or misunderstands the rigorous age verification and statistical analysis involved in identifying blue zones. The procedure is highly accurate and includes:
Subsequently, the ratio of long-livers to total births during the same time interval is recorded. This index reflects the probability of individuals born in the target area reaching the threshold age. The methodology considers all individuals born in the target area, whether alive, deceased, or emigrated. The process is designed to minimize the likelihood of false positives (Type I errors) and ensures accurate identification of blue zones.
In addition, we determine age-specific mortality rates of the older population, free of age-exaggeration bias, and estimate remaining life expectancy and probabilities of surviving to become a centenarian.
In Sardinia, for example, we double-checked the age of every centenarian in the blue zone villages using:
Not only were the birth and death dates of each centenarian confirmed, but those of their siblings were also cross-checked. This allowed us to rule out any possible identity switches, such as the case of a false supercentenarian that was rigorously eliminated from our Sardinian centenarians’ database (15).
Alternatively, in the Nicoya blue zone, all estimates are based on well-documented birth dates from the civil registration registry established in Costa Rica in 1883, rather than self-reported ages. Individuals not found in the registry (immigrants) or whose birth was recorded later in life were excluded.
Newman’s draft papers, which he is vigorously promoting in the mainstream media, attempt to discredit the blue zones by presenting a series of false equivalencies (13, 14). He argues that the excessive number of centenarians and supercentenarians in non-blue zone areas is due to poor demographic records, which is often the case. However, he ignores the fact that this criticism does not apply to blue zones, where ages have been rigorously validated with modern, accurate demographic methodology.
Newman also alleges that birthdates in blue zones exhibit “age heaping” patterns. However, such patterns do not appear in the validated datasets from blue zones, which show no unusual distribution of birthdates. Furthermore, his examples of fraudulent death registrations in Japan and the U.S. have no bearing on blue zones, as we have meticulously validated all ages before analysis, expunging any such cases from our datasets.
His assertion that blue zones correspond to regions with high illiteracy, poverty, and crime is misleading. While some blue zones experienced delays in economic and social development (16), these factors have no influence on the calculation of longevity rates. For instance, in 2005, Okinawa had the highest centenarian rate from age 70, far surpassing Japanese national averages (17). However, as we have publicly acknowledged, the growth in life expectancy in Okinawa has slowed, particularly in comparison to other prefectures in Japan. There are various factors contributing to this phenomenon, but a social gradient involving high illiteracy, poverty, and crime is not among them (16). Japan is well known for having one of the lowest crime rates in the world. However, the arrival of modern (Western) diets and transportation infrastructure that does not promote walking has led to reduced activity levels, lower energy expenditure, and increasing rates of obesity in Okinawa prefecture (18). Longevity is not a static phenomenon and can change as lifestyle shifts occur within a population. Age validation studies have also been conducted in Okinawa using methods similar to those used in other blue zones, providing strong evidence for the exceptional longevity of the Okinawan blue zone (19).
Newman’s use of Sardinia-wide crime and poverty statistics to generalize about blue zones is also misleading. The Sardinian blue zone is a small rural area of about 50,000 people spread across six mountain villages, whereas Sardinia as a whole has a population of 1.6 million, most of whom live in major urban areas like Sassari and Cagliari.
In conclusion, the ages of individuals in the officially recognized blue zones have been thoroughly validated, and their exceptional longevity is well-documented. Newman’s unreviewed papers are both ethically and academically irresponsible. His promotion of them in the mainstream media is an insult to both the scientific community and the blue zones communities themselves, who take pride in their elders and culture of longevity.
Sincerely,
Gianni Pes
Dip. Medicina, Chirurgia e Farmacia, Università di Sassari, Sassari, Italy.
Luis Rosero-Bixby
Centro Centroamericano de Población, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica.
Christina Chrysohoou, Christodoulos Stefanadis
Bradley J. Willcox
Craig Willcox
Department of Human Welfare, Okinawa International University, Ginowan 901-2701, Japan.
References: